Is McCain leading by 15 points in all polls?

Bryant Pillitteri: No, He is trailing. See for yourself. Here is a link to 8 polls.

Lia Argall: I mean, who needs the Democrat PARTY anymore, now that Republicans control 70% of the Federal and State Offices. Obama clearly SUPPORTS measures that will keep his Islamic buddies in the Oil & Be Heading business for decades to come. Isn't it Great, that this Love will never ChangeAMERICA IN GOD WE TRUST-Oregon anti immigration legislation passage vote is a warning for Obama ASSOCIATED PRESS -Obama facing opposition to immigration plan being outlined THURSDAY NIGHT Associated Press -Immigration Action Will Make Obama Even More Radioactive to Democrats in 2016 The Fiscal Times -Immigration row fuels early 2016 US presidential race AFP inShare Lower-tier CRIMINALS such as drunken DRIVERS and drug dealers aren't on the priority list of people to deport, according to a memo from Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, who outlined guidelines for the nation's im! migration officers working to administer President Barack Obama's new executive order for amnesty. As a teenager in 1982, out Roller Skating from the St Johns BRIDGE to Theodore Roosevelt H.S., I was known as Sexy Sadie ....since I laid it down for all to see.... in my shorty jumper..... she came along to turn on everyone.......Sexy Sadie what have you done.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oifQ8syuy4s

Lyndon Mattas: No the average of the polls is Obama by 6% but polls can not be trusted

Estrella Northway: No you have to be 18. Being on teh electoral roll just proves who you are and where you live. When you turn 18 and if teh election falls on or after your birthday , you'll be able to vote

Matt Gerdeman: No, you are dead wrong. He is behind in all polls, and 15% behind in latest Newsweek Poll.PS Bookmark the link so you have real info in the future. Your current sources leave a little bit to be desired.Thumbs down? ROFL! This is not my opinion, it's ! a fact....Show more

Ermelinda Stalnaker: It was the dire! ct result of the basic flaw in the Democrat approach to terrorism. This is the fundamental difference between Republican and Democrat philosophy on terrorism:Republican-we are at warDemocrat-it is a criminal matterIf one approaches the threat of global fundamentalist Islamic terror as a police matter, they win. Why? Because the Criminal Justice System is designed to prosecute criminals according to a very strict system of evidentiary rules and regulations AFTER a crime has already been committed.In Bill Clinton's own words, when Osama Bin Ladin was in custody abroad and offered to the U.S. he refused to take him. Why? Because the Justice Department did not think it could convict him. He was probably right. In fact, if Bin Ladin walked in and surrendered to the FBI this afternoon we probably do not have enough evidence to convict him. When the acts of terror are executed those to actually commit the act are killed doing it. Proving who ordered it is nearly impossibl! e.However, if it is approached using the rules of war, America can act preemptively. There is no such thing as presumptive prosecution. So, which do you prefer? Attacking the terrorists, their leadership, organizations and the countries supporting them militarily? Or waiting until after more cities are attacked and many thousands of innocent people killed and calling in the CSI unit to take fingerprints?*...Show more

Barton Morfee: Is Obama the solution? Visit www.youtube.com/v/upYdbkSnd0M&hl=en

Alden Soldano: Yes I believe Clinton's policies contributed to the 9/11 attack on the United States. The Muslims knew that all Clinton would do is through a few bombs into the dessert and talk big, they did not count on Bush fighting back. As for why everybody blames Bush for there problems, people tend to blame the leader for rough times and it would not matter who it is. If obama is elected, in three years he would be hated to.

Hollis Demasters: I think it wa! s just a case of no one wanting to look long and hard at the threat. T! he economy was going well, things were good and nobody wanted to hear it. Clinton himself said he'd raise issues about security but no one was interested in tackling the issues. Bush said the same thing.

Vern Serratos: my birthday is one day before the deadline...please hold out till the 3rd gordan XD

Michal Semple: Whilst you are on the electoral roll, that is only in case there is an election after your birthday and before October when the annual review of the electoral roll takes place. You know how it works - when you turn up at the polling station, they check your name on the list. Yours either won't be there or will be marked to show you're under 18. So the poll officers won't give you a ballot paper. Sorry but you only get your turn next time :(

Hunter Beech: Can you provide a link to the so-called report that allegedly said this, because the one I've read that was released on 11/21 is only about the actions of the intelligence community durin! g the events, not about the actions of the Obama administration.It found the CIA had effectively provided the administration an accurate account of the deteriorating security situation in Benghazi and that its reactions during and after the attack were exemplary and heroic.These things weren't really in doubt. The issue was never whether the CIA had failed to do its job.So, which one did you read?...Show more

Launa Weingarten: You are not

Star Gollnick: The republicans showed how low they will go using falling hero's dead bodies for their political gain. They are the lowest of character and I detest every republican in America

Paul Maymi: The elections are over, Benghazi for-profit served its purpose, and now they will be looking for something to get them through the next two years. At least Issa was asked to step down because of his abuse of power and wasting taxpayer money. It certainly took them long enough. I just wished that they would have been e! qually concerned with investigating Bush Junior, and Cheney, for Iraq a! s they were with Benghazi....Show more

Darwin Ecton: Drop the issue!?!!????BAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA!!!!You are SUCH a dreamer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Of COURSE they are NOT going to drop the issue!!!!!!!!!!!!When did FACTS ever stop Faux News or republicans from ranting and raving anyway? six years of Birther crapola.......and they Still ran Trump for president. What difference does FACTS or congressional hearing findings make????Of course they will keep screaming about Benghazi, and in fact, ,they will ramp it UP, once Hilary finally announces she's running. You think we've heard the LAST of this, just because Congress has declared a few FACTS?!?!?!?!? Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahah!!!!! Dont be silly!I like your wishful thinking though!!! That's the spirit........keep the faith!...Show more

Dulcie Edis: No. Many people still make this mistake. 9-11 was an attack carried out by Muslim terrorists. Bill! Clinton had nothing to do with it.

Giovanna Sherlin: was that on Fox News~??!!surely you jest~!!!

Monty Sieloff: I think many people are more than ready to drop the issue......on both sides. As horrific as this event was, many liberals felt that the trumped up charges were nothing more than a manufactured scandal against the Obama administration for political, Republican gain. Some conservatives may have believed that it was a manufactured scandal but still charged along with the pack, and others fell in step actually believing that the Obama administration was lying and covering up. Well, after thousands of hours of investigation and millions of dollars later, the Intelligence committee has determined and cleared the Obama administration of the charges. The committee consisted of both Democrats and Republicans.....so that should be the end of it, but No, we have Lindsey Graham now calling the report "full of crap." The appropriate and honorable thing would ! be to accept the verdict, whether he likes it or not, and move on to ot! her issues of governance. He just hates being made to look wrong and seems to be having a grown up temper tantrum about it. It makes him look kind of foolish, and I have a feeling that he will find more people distancing themselves from him over it. If liberals can drop the issue, and I think they will, most certainly, reasonable conservatives should also be able to drop the issue....Show more

Darnell Cutliff: 9-11 was not any one man's fault. It was the result of a variety of factors like poor intelligence, lack of safety checks at airports, weak immigration controls ( each of these has become draconian now)Osama and Co. did it to deliver a blow to US on US soil. They did it for the psychological and economic reasons....Show more

Dorine Nurre: If that is true that means McCain has never flip-flopped before.

Dick Ovdenk: The only people to blame for 9/11 are the terrorists that flew planes into buildings. Stop living in the past.

Antone Youla: W! hy blame Bush? Because when Clinton was in office we weren't on the brink of a 3rd World War. They hate us so much more than they ever have. It's the way Bush made desicions since 9/11 that has cost us more American soldiers' lives that we ever would have imagined.

Julieta Suleiman: It could be dropped, but it won't be. The Repubs are going to cling to that manufactured scandal to use against Hillary in 2016 - that's how desperate they are. You've got people like Lindsay Graham and John McCain who have done a lot of nattering about Benghazi - so they have a big investment. Not to mention all the airtime that False News has given it.

Chanda Wittwer: Obama and his Administration has lied on so much so often that I trust absolutely zero of what I hear from either Democrat or Republican. You need to read 13 hours in Benghazi by Mitchell Zuckoff. Then you can decide for yourself.

Berry Gilmore: No that would not be correct.There is not a single national poll in! the field at present that McCain is winning.http://www.realclearpoliti! cs.com/epolls/2008/presi...

Asley Quickle: I would like to read the official report. The only information I have privy to is what Yahoo News and other LAME STREAM media outlets tell us. The info we are being fed contradicts the stories being told by people on the ground in Benghazi during the attacks. The issue may be dropped by republicans, but I believe any american that desires to know the truth, this issue will always be just another cover up.

Samatha Nicar: No. Obama is leading by 15 points in one poll.

Jestine Osumi: Sorry, you picked up the morning paper from Bizarro World in which everything is backwards.

Mark Hovanes: I heard it exactly the opposite

Ellis Cellar: Washington (AFP) - A probe by a Congressional committee into the September 11, 2012 attack on a US compound in Benghazi debunked allegations that President Barack Obama's administration fell down on the job.Since the assault on the US mission in the Libyan city, which left! the ambassador and three colleagues dead, the White House, CIA and State Department have been accused of mishandling their response.But the report released Friday by the House intelligence committee, which is led by some of Obama's fiercest Republican opponents, cleared the administration of all the most serious charges.http://news.yahoo.com/us-congress-report-debunks-b......Show more

Valentine Willinger: George Bush was our president when 9-11 took place....we blame him now because of the way he handled it...we are in a war with no real end in site....I'm personally angry that Bin Laden hasn't been captured...you speak of Somalia...a war we didn't need....how do you then justify the war in Iraq

Tyrone Disanti: If the Bush administration had taken terrorism seriously upon taking office and made it a real priority, you might have a bit of a point. However, you have to take into account that they did nothing of the sort and instead ignored multiple warnings of an! impending attack, and even intentionally impeded investigations into t! errorism.. David Schippers, the attorney who impeached Clinton, was told months beforehand by friends in the FBI that something huge was in the works. He tried to warn Ashcroft and the Bush Justice Department and pass on his evidence, but he was snubbed repeatedly. Listen to Alex Jones' interview with Schippers in the movie 9/11: The Road to Tyranny. Bush also sent out executive orders directly impeding investigations of the Bin Ladens. http://www1.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/ar...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8P4NG4yk2w

Loise Mausser: Sen. Lindsey Graham: Benghazi report 'full of crap'Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Sunday shredded a recently released report that concluded the Obama administration did not engage in an alleged cover-up to hide details about the Benghazi embassy attack.

Dannie Briseno: im 17 and the general ellections is approaching. I am on the electral roll as my birthday is nearing (2nd June). can i vote at 17 because im on the elec! tral roll?

Dorinda Metzer: Uh.. NO. In the worst case scenario, they are tied. In about 75% of the polls Obama is slightly ahead. In zero polls is McCain ahead. And just for the record, I don't like Obama, but given only the two choices even he is better than McCain, and that ain't saying much. I even wonder if he will actually end up being the real repub to run. There is a rumor he will drop out and be replaced.

Sheree Hipwell: No, he's not leading by 15 points, much less leading, in any general election poll, to be correct.

Ewa Homrich: Remeber the USS Cole, the bombing in US embassys around the world, Somalia (a war we didn't need in a Muslin country), The Balkanes, he made more mistakes than Bush and brough down the economy too, so why we blame Bush for everything that happens now?

Nancy Mansell: and for those who said that Bush knew, yes he knew but 9-11 didn't happen in 20 months it took years to plan that.

Victor Macallister: The U! SS Cole happened at the very end of his administration, and the FBI didn! 't determine and place attribution to al Qaeda until AFTER he left office. Therefore, if nothing was done about Cole, it was because Bush didn't care to do so.With almost all other attacks against us, we responded, tracked down perpetrators and they were brought to justice.In the Balkans, he stopped an ongoing genocide. How is that bad? The economy - longest unbroken period of growth, and the hugest budget surpluses, which is what he handed off to Bush. Somalia was an extension of Bush I's policy that he was left with, and what he did there was stayed exactly as long as he said we would, not more, no less.Bush gets blamed for things that he bears culpability for, including the 9/11 attacks, which happened after he ignored bin Laden and terrorists for 9 months. It's not because Clinton handed him a weak anti-terrorist program, it's that Bush dismantled what Clinton put in place, mostly because it was Clinton's (kind of a jr. high spite-based decision), but had nothing t! o put in to replace it.Most of the measures passed afterwards - tracking of financing, mandatory tracers/markers for tracking of explosives and dangerous chemicals, WERE ALMOST ALL ASKED FOR BY CLINTON WHEN HE WAS IN OFFICE, BUT HE WAS BLOCKED BY A REPUBLICAN CONGRESS BECAUSE THEIR INDUSTRY SPECIAL INTERESTS DIDN'T LIKE THEM.Maybe you need to do some very, very basic research on the facts before asking questions based on complete ignorance....Show more